Would you call
>a Mao-like cultural movement intent on rule, and corrupting America, “the trans Mafia”.
friendly worsds?
And all the context can't sugarcoat this
>A woman shall not wear a man’s garment, nor shall a man put on a woman’s cloak, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord your God. You hear that, William Thomas? You’re an abomination to God.
So not only does he call all woman wearing a man’s garment an abomination, he also misses the point. From Lia Catherine Thomas' point of view she isn't a man wearing women's cloth but a women wearing women's cloth.
What brings us to the main point the right always doesn't get: What is a woman? If body and mind have the same gender it's easy but what if body and mind have a different gender? Seems to me the concept that the mind doesn't need to align with the body seems impossible to them.
> What first went from, “Well, we have to tolerate, okay.” Then, “You must accept, okay.” Then, “You must celebrate” I don’t know if I’m comfortable with that. And then, “You must participate.” And if you can’t participate, your kids must participate.
That part is also quite interesting. Reminds of the latest iutcry about Snoop Dogs comments about a same-sex couple in Lightyear. Somehow people have the urge to explain same-sex intercourse whenever a same-sex couple is shown. I don't know where that come from. Do they think they need to explain hetero intercourse when a hetero couple is shown? Maybe they should thinl more of the love you mentioned in the beginning and which is a large part of New Testament, the foundation of Christanity, which I can't see in Kirk's speeches.
But I can see that he called trans women in sport an idelogy of pure evil
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1819017846850306299
And that is only based on rumors and Imane Khelif's looks. And somehow he and others ignore that she has lost 9 fights what should be impossible according to Kirk's and other's claims.
We also know what the result is of preparing such a culture war battleground
https://people.com/department-of-justice-quietly-deletes-stu...
At least we could before they removed it.
We also see that hate speech all of a sudden is a thing while free speech isn't anymore.
Kirk was the more eloquent addition to Trump, different words, same idiology.