Hacker News Reader

Comment by JoeAltmaier | Hacker News Reader

But most engineering projects don't have hundreds of millions of moving parts. At that scale, standard practice becomes intractable.

The Space Shuttle went up the first time with a few K of core memory. The software effort was really pretty trivial compared with systems today.

View on HN

The article is from 1996 but even then they were far beyond a few K.

"Take the upgrade of the software to permit the shuttle to navigate with Global Positioning Satellites, a change that involves just 1.5% of the program, or 6,366 lines of code. The specs for that one change run 2,500 pages, a volume thicker than a phone book. The specs for the current program fill 30 volumes and run 40,000 pages."

My point exactly. That process can't work unless you have millions to spend.

The brain of NASA’s primary vehicle has the computational power of an IBM 5150, that ’80s icon that goes for $20 at yard sales. According to NASA and IBM, the shuttle’s General Purpose Computer (GPC)—which controls, among other things, the entire launch sequence—is an upgrade of the 500-kilobyte computer the shuttle flew with until 1991.

  --  http://www.popsci.com/node/31716

Reply on news.ycombinator.com