Yt-dlp: Upcoming new requirements for YouTube downloads
github.com
github.com
Awaiting their “premium cannot be shared with people outside household” policy so I can finally cancel. Family members make good use of ad-free.
I finally got so fed up, I bought a Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 off ebay for $50 and flashed it with LineageOS. I can now load whatever media I want onto the 1 TB sdcard I've installed in it. The 5 year old hardware plays videos just fine with the VLC app. And, as a bonus, I discovered that NewPipe, an alternative YouTube client I installed through the F-Droid store, is actually much more reliable at downloading videos than the official client. I was planning on using yt-dlp to load up the sdcard, but now I don't even need to do that.
It's time to milk the entire userbase for every cent they can get out of them by any means necessary. The future is bleak.
NewPipe is so good and so useful. It can even play 4K and watch livestreams now.
The TIDAL app is absolute trash, it has this same issue all the time; not just that, but also, if a download fails it just hangs there and does not download the rest of the album/playlist.
Also, why would you want to download things in the first place? To watch them offline, right? Well, guess what happens when you open the app w/o an internet connection ... it asks you to login, so you cannot even access your music. 900k/year TOC genius work there.
The only reason why I haven't canceled is because I'm too lazy to reset my password in order to login and cancel, lol. Might do it soon, though.
Download feature on iOS always works flawlessly whenever I need to hop on a long haul flight (several times a year).
I'm in a Spanish speaking country, but I want to watch English videos in English.
Auto-generated subtitles for other languages are ok, but I want to listen to the original voices!
I was using the browser feature that disables the mobile mode on smartphones.
The autodub feature should be disabled asap. Or at least have a way to disable globally on all my devices.
When they recently insisted by email I download any videos before they sunset the feature, their option only gave me the SD version (and it took a while to perform the data export).
I was also a holdover from a paying Play Music subscriber, and this was shortly after the pita music switchover to youtube, so it was a last straw.
Then I have good news for you! https://lifehacker.com/tech/youtube-family-premium-crackdown
In fact, I've got an email from them about this already. My YT is still ad-free though, so not sure when it's going to kick in for real.
While it doesn’t totally remove it, it lets me choose if I want to watch or not, and gets me past it in a single button press. All using the native app. I was surprised the first time this happened. I assume the creators hate it.
So long as they are broadcasting media to the public without an explicit login system, so as to take advantage of public access for exposure, it will remain perfectly legitimate and ethical to access the content through whatever browser or software you want.
After they blitzed me with ads and started arbitrarily changing features and degrading the experience, I stopped paying them and went for the free and adblocking clients and experience.
I may get rid of phones from my life entirely if they follow through with blocking third party apps and locking things down.
For now. I suspect this is the real reason Google is going to require a developer cert even for sideloaded apps: https://www.techradar.com/phones/android/google-will-soon-st...
until next year, when google will require real name and address for dev of side loaded apps
Feels like the app has passed the complexity threshold of what the team responsible for it can handle. Or possibly, too much AI code and not enough review and testing. And those don't have to be exclusive possibilities.
Giving you the bytes would be easy, the hard part is preventing the free flow of information. And those bugs are the side effects.
I recently got paused for "watching on another device" when I wasn't. I don't think that policy you mention is too far off.
That's been a policy for a while, the sign up page prominently says "Plan members must be in the same household".
No idea if its enforced though.
There are no files anymore. I mean, there technically are, but copyright industry doesn't want you to look at them without authorization, security people don't want you to look at them at all, and UX experts think it's a bad idea for you to even know such thing as "files" exists.
Share and enjoy. Like and subscribe. The world is just apps all the way down.
We are not the same.
> Why not use Brave browser
We still need competition in the browser space or Google gets to have a disproportionate say in how the Internet is structured. I promise you, Firefox and Safari aren't that bad. Maybe Firefox is a little different but I doubt it's meaningfully different for most people [0]. So at least get your non techie family and friends onto them and install an ad blocker while you're at it.
[0] the fact that you're an individual may mean you're not like most people. You being different doesn't invalidate the claim.
Reddit has the answer for you: https://www.reddit.com/r/browsers/comments/1j1pq7b/list_of_b...
1. Unlimited YouTube Premium
2. Unlimited drink reimbursement (coffee, tea, smoothies, whatever)
The psychological sense of loss from those two things would be larger than any 5% raise.
https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/blob/2025.09.23/yt_dlp/jsin...
Here are lines 431 through 433:
if expr.startswith('new '):
obj = expr[4:]
if obj.startswith('Date('):Basically any publicly known method that can sip video content with doing the least work and authentication will be a common point of attack for this.
The submission is literally about them moving away from it in favor of Deno, so I think "never" probably gets pretty close.
My wife was interested in the idea that I was running "Netfix from home" and enjoyed the lack of ads or BS when we watched any content. I never really thought I would be an "example" or anything like that - I fully expected everyone else to embrace streaming for the rest of time because I didn't think those companies would make so many mistakes. I've been telling people for the last decade "That's awesome I watch using my own thing, what shows are your favorites I want to make sure I have them"
In the last 2 years more family members and friends have requested access to my Jellyfin and asked me to setup a similar setup with less storage underneath their TV in the living room or in a closet.
Recently-ish we have expanded our Jellyfin to have some YouTube content on it. Each channel just gets a directory and gets this command ran:
yt-dlp "$CHANNEL_URL" \
--download-archive "downloaded.txt" \
--playlist-end 10 \
--match-filters "live_status = 'not_live' & webpage_url!*='/shorts/' & original_url!*='/shorts/'" \
-f "bv*[height<=720]+ba/b[height<=720]" \
--merge-output-format mp4 \
-o "%(upload_date>%Y-%m-%d)s - %(title)s.%(ext)s"
Let's make sure that when all those people come looking for solutions, they'll find ones that are easy to set up and mostly "just work", at least to the extent this can be done given that content providers are always going to be hostile.
I struggled with that myself (yt-dlp documentation could use some work). What's currently working for me is:
yt-dlp -f "bestvideo[width<800][vcodec~='^(avc|h264)']+bestaudio[acodec~='^((mp|aa))']"you can also skip the match filters by running the /videos URL instead of the main channel url.
if you want 720p, use -S res:720
you are missing [vcodec^=avc1] ?
Luckily all that is becoming a non-issue, as most content on these websites isn't worth scraping anymore.
What you want is to just download the 10-20kb html file, maybe a corresponding css file, and any images referenced by the html. Then if you want the video you just get the video file direct.
Simple and effective, unless you have something to sell.
Soon, LLMs will be able to complete any Captcha a human can within reasonable time. When that happens, the "analog hole" may be open permanently. If you can point a camera and a microphone at it, the AI will be able to make better sense of it than a person.
I can literally just go write a script that uses headless firefox + mitmproxy in about an hour or two of fiddling, and as long as I then don't go try to run it from 100 VPS's and scrape their entire website in a huge blast, I can typically archive whatever content I actually care about. Basically no matter what protection mechanisms they have in place. Cloudflare won't detect a headless firefox at low (and by "low" I mean basically anything you could do off your laptop from your home IP) rates, modern browser scripting is extremely easy, so you can often scrape things with mild single-person effort even if the site is an SPA with tons of dynamic JS. And obviously at low scale you can just solve captchas yourself.
I recently wrote a scraper script that just sent me a discord ping whenever it ran into a captcha, and i'd just go look at my laptop and fix it, and then let it keep scraping. I was archiving a comic I paid for but was in a walled-garden app that obviously didn't want you to even THINK of controlling the data you paid for.
* PeerTube and similar platforms for video streaming of freely-distributable content;
* BitTorrent-based mechanisms for sharing large files (or similar protocols).
Will this be inconvenient? At first, somewhat. But I am led to believe that in the second category one can already achieve a decent experience.
All thanks to great ideas like downloading the whole internet and feeding it into slop-producing machines fueling global warming in an attempt to make said internet obsolete and prop up an industry bubble.
The future of the internet is, at best, bleak. Forget about openness. Paywalls, authwalls, captchas and verification cans are here to stay.
I want them to go overboard. I want BigTech to go nuts on this stuff. I want broken systems and nonsense.
Because that’s the only way we’re going to get anything better.
For a while now, I've been forced to change "watch?v=" to "/embed/" to watch something in 480p on an i3 Gen 4, where the same video, when downloaded, uses ~3% of the CPU.
However, unfortunately, it doesn't always work anymore.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvFZjo5PgG0 https://www.youtube.com/embed/xvFZjo5PgG0
While they worsen the user experience, other sites optimize their players and don't seem to care about downloaders (pr0n sites, for example).
There are browser extensions like h264ify that block newer codecs but WHY??? Is nobody at YouTube caring about the user experience? It’s easier and more reliable to just download the videos.
PoToken - Proof of origin token which Google has lately been enforcing for all clients, or video requests will fail with a 403. On android it uses DroidGuard, for IOS, it uses built in app integrity apis. For the web it requires that you run a snippet of javascript code (the challenge) in the browser to prove that you are not a bot. Previously, you needed an external tool to generate these PoTokens but with the Deno change yt-dlp should be capable of producing these tokens by itself in the near future.
SABR - Server side adaptive bitrate streaming, used alongside Google's UMP protocol to allow the server to have more control over buffering, given data from the client about the current playback position, buffered ranges, and more. This technology is also used to do server-side ad injection. Work is still being done to make 3rd party clients work with this technology (sometimes works, sometimes doesn't).
Nsig/sig extraction example:
- https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/blob/4429fd0450a3fbd5e89573...
- https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/blob/4429fd0450a3fbd5e89573...
PoToken generation:
- https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/wiki/PO-Token-Guide
- https://github.com/LuanRT/BgUtils
SABR:
- https://github.com/LuanRT/googlevideo
EDIT2: Addeded more links to specific code examples/guides
Now you know.
Amazing how they simply couldn't win - you deliver content to client, the content goes to the client. Could be the largest corporation of the world and we still have yt-dlp.
That's why all of them wanted proprietary walled gardens where they would be able to control the client too - so you get to watch the ads or pay up.
How does this prove you are not a bot. How does this code not work in a headless Chromimum if it's just client side JS?
It's it's always been very apparent that YouTube are doing _just enough_ to stop downloads while also supporting a global audience of 3 billion users.
If the world all had modern iPhones or Android devices you'd bet they'd straight up DRM all content
And I call that a theory for a reason. Creators can still download their videos from YT Studio, I'm not sure how much importance there is on being able to download any video ever (and worst case scenario people could screen recording videos)
e.g. censorship, metadata, real time society-wide trends, etc...
google is way-way more than just a company.
> Why can't we embed a lightweight interpreter such as QuickJS?
> @Ronsor #14404 (comment)
The linked comment [2]:
> @dirkf This solution was tested with QuickJS which yielded execution times of >20 minutes per video
How on earth can it be that terrible compared to Deno?
[1] https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/14404#issuecomment-3...
[2] https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/14404#issuecomment-3...
QuickJS uses a bytecode interpreter (like Python, famously slow), and is optimised for simplicity and correctness. Whereas Deno uses a JIT compiler (like Java, .NET and WASM). Deno uses the same JIT compiler as Chrome, one of the most heavily-optimised in the world.
That doesn't normally lead to such a large factor in time difference, but it explains most of it, and depending on the type of code being run, it could explain all of it in this case.
QuickJIT (a fork of QuickJS that uses TCC for JIT) might yield better results, but still slower than Deno.
This solution looks interesting, but I am technical enough to know that this looks like a PITA to setup and maintain. It also seems like it is focused on downloading everything from a subbed channel.
As it is now, with a folder of downloaded videos, I just need a local web server that can interpret the video names and create an organized page with links. Is there anything like this that is very lightweight with a next next finish install?
You already need such things for certain formats.
I think we can safely assume that the only content under DRM at YouTube today is the content where it's absolutely legally necessary.
But if they decide they have to, they can do it fairly trivially.
It's their application, yt-dlp can use whatever it wants. But they made their choices for stylistic/aesthetic reasons.
To me this is a bit alarming as IIRC most app runtime libraries that also have this in-runtime-only sandboxing approach are moving away from that idea precisely because it is not resistant to attackers exploiting vulnerabilities in the runtime itself, pushing platform developers instead toward process-level system kernel-enforced sandboxing (Docker containers or other Linux cgroups, Windows AppContainer, macOS sandboxing, etc.).
So for example, .NET dropped its Code Access Security and AppDomain features in recent versions, and Java has now done the same with its SecurityManager. Perl still has taint mode but I wonder if it too will eventually go away.
More concretely, the additional Deno dependency is quite problematic for my music player, especially after I did all that work to get a static, embeddable CPython built [2].
Ideally for me, yt-dlp would be packaged into something trivially embeddable and sandboxable, such as WebAssembly, calling into external APIs for things like networking[3]. This would reduce the value delivered by the yt-dlp project into pure DRM-defeating computation, leaving concerns such as CLI/GUI to a separate group of maintainers. A different project could choose to fulfill those dependencies with Deno, or Rust, or as in my case, built directly into a music player in Zig.
Of course I don't expect the yt-dlp maintainers to do that. They're doing something for fun, for free, for pride, for self-respect... in any case their goals aren't exactly perfectly aligned with mine, so if I want to benefit from their much appreciated labor, I have to provide the computational environment that they depend on (CPython[4] and Deno).
But yeah, that's now going to be a huge pain in the ass because now I either have to drop support for yt-dlp in my music player, or additionally embed deno, as well as introduce Rust as a build dependency... neither of which I find acceptable. And don't even get me started on Docker.
[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCLrNqc9jdE
[2]: https://github.com/allyourcodebase/cpython
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45314055
Just like git! This is the present and future. :(
I wonder why. Perhaps because people use bots to mass-crawl contents from youtube to train their AI. And Youtube prioritizes normal users who only watch a few videos at most at the same time, over those crawling bots.
Who knows?
My point was that the large players have monopoly hold on large swaths of the internet and are using it to further advantage themselves over the competition. See Veo 3 as an example, YouTube creators didn’t upload their work to help Google train a model to compete with them but Google did it anyways, and creators didn’t have a choice because all eye balls are on YouTube.
Yes, we have archive.org. We need more than that, though.
I’m sure there’s some distributed solution like IPFS but I haven’t seen any serious attempt to make this accessible to every day people.
There are many thousands of paid hosting services, feel free to pick one. It turns out hosting TB of data for free is a pretty tricky business model to nail down.
And even if the legal attacks could be mitigated most people would still use youtube because they're there for the money (or for people who are there for the money). They are not there for a video host. Youtube enables distribution of money and there's no way that any government would let any free system distribute money without even more intense legal, and indeed physically violent, attacks.
It is the same reason why people just can't get off IG. Network effect and in YT case a lot of disk space and bandwidth.
I admit I haven’t looked into peertube, and I didn’t think that rumble was any better than YouTube. I don’t recognize the others. Thank you; I’ll resurvey.
YouTube's economy of scale goes way beyond having their own datacenters, they have edge caches installed inside most ISP networks which soak up YT traffic before it even reaches a Google DC. It would take a staggering amount of investment to compete with them on cost.
CSAM peddlers, intellectual property violators, unconsensual sexual material ("revenge porn"), malware authors looking for places to exfiltrate stolen data, propagandists and terrorists, the list of abusers is as long as it is dire.
And for some of these abuser classes, the risk for any storage service is high. Various jurisdictions require extremely fast and thorough responses for a service provider to not be held liable, sometimes with turnaround times of 24 hours or less (EU anti terrorism legislation), sometimes with extremely steep fines including prison time for responsible persons. Hell, TOR exit node providers have had their homes raided and themselves held in police arrest or, worse, facing criminal prosecution and prison time particularly for CSAM charges - and these are transit providers, not persistent storage.
And all of that's before looking on the infrastructure provider side. Some will just cut you off when you're facing a DDoS attack, some will bring in extortionate fees (looking at you, AWS/GCE/Azure) for traffic that may leave you in personal bankruptcy. And if you are willing to take that risk, you'll still run the challenge of paying for the hardware itself - storage isn't cheap, 20TB of storage will be around 200€ and you want some redundancy and backups, so the actual cost will rather be 60-100€/TB plus the ongoing cost of electricity and connectivity.
That's why you're not seeing much in terms of democratization.
Almost 25 years on the internet and I have not been able to download anything from IPFS. Does one need a PhD to do so?
Maybe there is an opportunity for that company to expand.
Is it just a lot of CPU-bound code and the modern JIT runtimes are simply that much faster, or is it doing some trickery that deno optimizes well?
> Currently, a new style of player JS is beginning to be sent where the challenge code is no longer modular but is hooked into other code throughout the player JS.
So it's no longer a standalone script that can be interpreted but it depends on all the other code on the site? Which could still be interpreted maybe but is a lot more complex and might need DOM etc?
Just guessing here, if anyone knows the details would love to hear more.
I mean, running some unknown highly obfuscated CPU-demanding JS code on your machine - and using its results to decide whether to permit or deny video downloads.
The enshittification will continue until user morale improves.
It's also common to have the non-Python (here, Rust) source in source distributions ("sdists"), but this project's sdist is only a few kilobytes and basically functions as a meta-package (and also includes no license info). It "builds" Deno by detecting the platform, downloading a corresponding zip from the GitHub releases page, extracting the standalone Rust executable, and then letting Hatchling (a popular build tool in the Python ecosystem) repackage that in a wheel.
Update: It turns out that the Python package is published by a third party, so I submitted an issue (https://github.com/manzt/denop/issues/1) to ask about the licensing.
"yt-dlp needs a copy of your digitized prefrontal cortex in order to bypass Youtube's HumanizeWeb brain scanner"
"yt-dlp moves to Deno runtime"
That makes it seem like yt-dlp itself was rewritten from Python to JavaScript (for those who even know it’s Python) or that it used to use Node and now uses Deno.
Once upon a time (around 2000) they tried to fix this by making cameras illegal except for licensed photographers.
https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/14404#issuecomment-3...
Just a few weeks/months ago, gogol search was blocked to noscript/basic (x)html browsers (I have witness gogol agenda about this unfold over the last few years).
Will use yt-dlp(zero whatng) until it breaks for good I guess.
The US administration failed to regulate the market domination of youtube with enforced simple and stable in time technical standards (what Big Tech hates). I don't blame them, since those nasty guys are smart border-line crime lords (and for sure serial offenders in EU).
Is there any other ways, non Big Tech ways, to access Sabine H. content? Or should I said good bye right now?
How could you miss the point that much?
"Other JS runtimes (node/bun) could potentially be supported in the future, the issue is that they do not provide the same security features and sandboxing that deno has. You would be running untrusted code on your machine with full system access. At this point, support for other JS runtimes is still TBD, but we are looking in to it."
https://github.com/TheFrenchGhosty/TheFrenchGhostys-Ultimate...
Then you open it up to third party businesses and get them tied to your platform, making money off your users.
Once locked in you turn the screws on the businesses to extract as much money from them as possible.
Finally you turn the screws on the users to extract every last bit of value from the platform before it withers and fades into irrelevance.
I have learned so much from YouTube - I wish it was more open and friendly to its creators and users :(
In the meantime, all we can do is support smaller alternatives like https://nebula.tv/
When i started getting 100,000's of downloads a day, google updated their html and blocked me from their search engine. I did the cat and mouse a few times but in the end it wasnt worth it.
Glad to see the legacy still lives on :D
User agents are like journalists: there's no such thing as pretending to be one.
If someone writes their own client and says, "This is a browser", then it is one.
NewPipe will probably need to add a JS runtime too.
The Android app uses an API which does not require a JS runtime, but it does require a Play Integrity token. The iOS app uses an API which is assumed to require an App Attest token.
Also, neither API supports browser cookies, which is a necessity for many users.
Not surprised to see yt-dlp make a similar choice.
> Yeah, you can just extract the zip and put deno.exe in the same folder as yt-dlp
I hope they just make this automatic if this truly becomes necessary. yt-dlp not having requirements, or having them built-in, isn't something just "convenient", I think there's users that wouldn't use the tool without that simplicity. Most people really don't like and try to avoid having to fight dependencies.
What tool can I use to simply store what my browser receives anyway, in a single video file?
This. I'm interested in such a tool or browser extension.
svn://svn.jdownloader.org/jdownloader/trunk
it's right there on the home page
https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/tree/master/yt_dlp/extracto...
A huge thank you to the yt-dlp folks. They do amazing work.
[1]: https://choubey.gitbook.io/internals-of-deno/architecture/v8
Plenty of devices have YouTube players which are not being capable of being updated and which must work, exploit those APIs.
But to answer your question, no, there aren't any suitable APIs (I've looked into it). They all either require JavaScript (youtube.com and the smart tv app) or require app integrity tokens (Android and iOS). Please let me know if you know something I don't?
To solve, just upgrade on linux using:
pip install -U "yt-dlp[default]"
Wow, this is equal parts fascinating and horrifying.
Edit, after looking into it a bit: It seems like a self-contained build of deno weighs in at around 40 MB (why?), so I can see why they tried to avoid that and appreciate the effort.
[1] https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/blob/2025.09.23/yt_dlp/jsin...
Its such a shithole, with no real replacement, sad state of affairs.
I don't promote piracy, but it seems that it's easier to download music from youtube than using torrents, which is quite surprising.
Who expected that such a big company would contribute to piracy?
But it’s a real mess it keeps crashing, something I might too humbly put down to me having too many files, but passive aggressively put it down to YouTube on iPad not having a limited amount of storage space.
On the other hand there’s a number of amazing videos I’ve downloaded to watch which have been remotely wiped. Grrr
https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/YouTube/Technical_det...
Maybe, for watching "recommended" stream without any subscriptions there are alternatives (which? I cannot name good ones, anyway), but if you watch your subscription you are bound to platform which contain this subscription. And no, content creators are not interchangeable.