> What part of this being a bad execution of the idea is confusing or contradictory?

And even then, "bad idea" is what you get after the extreme charity of assuming the Trump administration is fundamentally lawful.

It's even worse if you believe they're bunch of crooks that will use the "special exception" clause to extort/bribe companies into corrupt favors. For example, granting access to snoop without a court-order, biasing their moderation policies, silencing voices or messages the administration finds inconvenient, etc.