> Someone from the "People Team" appears at your desk with a bright smile and a clipboard.
THE WORST! Why can't we just work?! Do stuff, make money, get the f- out.
THE WORST! Why can't we just work?! Do stuff, make money, get the f- out.
E.g. communication tends to work best if you have A: trust and B: a mental model for the other person. A is a buffer against friction. B is essentially API documentation about this specific person
The social bits are how most people build A and B
There's no polite way to tell such individuals to f- off, of course, and it's often expected.
Humans are social creatures. We can't live in a vacuum nor on our own without support from other humans (i.e., food production).
Now, if other people do need corporate staged social games in order to build that up for themselves, then that’s ok for them, but why is that considered the norm? Why are they required? Why is it up to the neurodivergent person to exhaust themselves for them? Why is it considered normal for someone in a “People team” to ignore the needs of some of the people? I don’t see why other people’s needs are inherently more important than mine.
I don't know it has to be that way at all. There's probably lots of room for compromise. The "people team" would need to both know about the need and care enough to try to take it into account
He was an irritating person even without his camera. I hate having my picture taken, and I don't consent to having my face posted on social media. Later, when the company realised that setting money on fire isn't a solid business strategy, he was thankfully fired.
It's a job, not a religion.
It’s my personal escapism from the everydayness of existence.
For others it's a calling.
Nothing wrong with either - I just think it's worth being aware that people have different motivations.