While I love what Signal has done, the compromises are significant. I use Secure Scuttlebutt, Cabal, Spritely Goblins, Tor, email and a variety of other P2P software on whatever device I like, but Signal requires a phone with Android or Apple, and requires that I lock my id to my phone number.
> the compromises are significant.
> I use Secure Scuttlebutt, Cabal, Spritely Goblins, Tor,
Honestly, I don't care how secure or how private (phone numbers are a privacy issue, not a security issue) if I have no one to communicate with. You need to solve the mass adoption problem.
There are always compromises some of them are hard to make. Signal successfully makes private / secures the “normal” conversations that would otherwise be on some Facebook owned app. None of the alternatives manage to do that.
Once you get Signal messages from randos without fist contact. Like airbnb hosts with password codes or IT admins or lawyers… it makes clear that they are doin it right.
Honestly it's just shame the platforms won't allow them to be the “native” sms app like iMessage. That would be the most ideal and probably upset much of the police deparments.
I've never understood these. Even the non conspiracy stuff is just... nothing. Like do what? That's a roadblock for you? Then you shouldn't be on HN or be using a phone in the first place. Best to get off the internet all together.
I just don't understand why there's so much passionate hate. It feels like bots and trolls running a disinformation campaign but I actually think it's real people
It's sad because the people who are doubting tradeoffs Signal deliberately made don't seem to realize that it's these tradeoffs that make Signal work. They also usually don't offer any good faith critique, answers or solutions.