The framer has no valid framework. There are no such things as empirically valid statements in political science, as the field is composed of subjective narratives. There are no such things as political truths.
Oh, yes it is, there's history to learn from, just because you're unaware of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
> The framer has no valid framework.
If you understood the comment you replied to, you'd realize that "the framer" there refers to you, so your statement above means "mallowdram has no valid framework". Ironically, it's true - you lack a valid framework because you lack knowledge of logic, history and politics.
If you had an understanding of what history is, you'd understand it has no scientific validity.
https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262537995/how-history-gets-thin...
As there is no scientific basis for history, and there is no logic to politics (it is irrational), nothing stated by Alexander is valid.