Hacker News Reader

[stub for offtopicness]

(we changed 'open source' to 'source available' in the title above)

I flagged this because it appears the system is not actually open-source using the common understanding of the term.

“At this point, private individuals will not be able to obtain licences to the NanoMi platform.”

Does “open source” have a different meaning in Canadian?

It looks to me like they're doing some sort of legal technicality in order to qualify for funding of some sort.

This appears to be F tier legal fuckery, not open source at all.