“People will die if we do x” is important, even if it hurts the fee-fees.
“It’s a mass gathering” arguments met the same resistance. Any argument would have.
“It’s a mass gathering” arguments met the same resistance. Any argument would have.
It's a fraction of a drop in an ocean of online hostility and malevolence, but is still a contributor nonetheless.
Maybe that's just my fatal flaw of being eternally hopeful that people will actually use their intelligence. But if this isn't the case, then what are we even doing?
(as for your actual argument, one can make the same argument that people will die without being able to get their fix of social church interaction. so then we're talking about numbers for hypotheticals, and right back to the dynamic where it's not even about logic)