This is either clever satire or seems to be saying a politician should be able to shoot somebody on 5th avenue without legal consequence.
Given that the precedent is that the president can arbitrarily decide that the country is in a permanent state of national emergency and suspend the constitution indefinitely (which is literally what happened with the tariffs) that seems quite reasonable.
Upon hearing these words, pqtyw was enlightened.
Sure, its politics but it shouldn't be a hack for the president to do whatever he wants illegally. Obviously the courts should step in and stop this. Otherwise the constitution might as well be discarded and the congress disbanded.
> s lost when ignorantly amplifying misquotes
Just barely squeezed that ad hominem in, with some plausible deniability. Nice.
In any case - I suppose it could, if one misquoted. Fortunately for me, was intentional as my version seems to reflect the gist of what you're saying: we (the people) shouldn't enforce the law when it comes to the actions of the leaders we elect.