Civilisation would be better off without porn but this was obviously always a non-solution. In fact Google doesn't even censor its images still.
Hmmm...
(Also, I'll point out there are parental control settings for Google accounts)
I'd like very much to remove moral busybodies from my system but it seems very hard for people who have a grand plan for society to top coercing and leave me alone.
Its none of your business if people voluntarily produce it and its also none of your business if people voluntarily market it between each other.
I mean it is no secret a lot of people who produce these things have mental health issues or come from very poor families. That's not even including the illegal activity that might seem legal on the surface.
Arguing for the ban of porn is easy, because very few will defend it, and if they do, you just pull out the argument that production is also bad. As if the opponents doesn't want porn to produced safely, without trafficking or exploitation.
Really? In my experience, people who think they should be in charge of the interests of "civilization", or who are obsessed with other people's vices, have a lot more mental health issues. Mostly weird savior complexes or fucked up (usually guilt driven) purity obsessions.
That's no secret.
Is this true, or is this a belief that you are forced to believe because it's the only way you can give yourself any worth?
Meaning, do you just view yourself in such a poor light that the only achievement your mind could possibly muster for your existence is "well at least I don't watch porn"?