In the flow he describes you end up with processed_processed_processed_result.

I think what they're getting at is that they sometimes use composition of functions in places where other people might call the underlying functions as one procedure and have intermediate results.

At the end of the day, you're all saying different ways of keeping track of the intermediate results. Composition just has you drop the intermediate results when they're no longer relevant. And you can decompose if you want the intermediates.

That name is kind of redundant, since `result` implies `processed` in the first place.