Any way to tell if the convincing final numbers it told you are real or halucinated ?
e.g., if you had a heart condition, you can't just poll three LLMs and be "reasonably sure" you've properly diagnosed the ailment.
They probably meant that they could read (and trace) the logic in Python for correctness.
I would recommend spending that "couple thousand" for quote(s). It's a second opinion from someone who hopefully has high volume in your local market. And your downside could be the entire system plus remediation, fines, etc.
To be clear, I'm not opposed to experimenting, but I wouldn't rely on this. Appreciate your comment for the discussion.