> You assume the bias is in the LLM itself
Common large datasets being inherently biased towards some ideas/concepts and away from others in ways that imply negative things is something that there's a LOT of literature about
Common large datasets being inherently biased towards some ideas/concepts and away from others in ways that imply negative things is something that there's a LOT of literature about
The OP is making a claim that an LLM assumes a meeting between two women is childcare. I've worked with LLMs enough to know that current gen LLMs wouldn't make that assumption by default. There is no way that whatever calendar related data that was used to train LLMs would include majority of sole-women 1:1s being childcare focused. That seems extremely unlikely.
> No. There's no indication that children are involved or that care is being provided. It's just two people meeting.
Part of its thinking:
> This is a very vague description with no context about:
> What happens during the meeting
> Whether children are present
> What the purpose of the meeting is
> Any other relevant details
Claude is not going to say childcare, and it is not saying it is childcare.
My prompt was: ""regular meeting between two women". Is it childcare or not?".