Hacker News Reader

It’s not illegal for me to share non-confidential data of my employer either, but if you were hiring, would you want to understand an applicants attitudes towards such leaks especially after having issues with it in the past?

I would.

View on HN

So it’s not involved in a criminal investigation. Then it’s a loyalty test. Specifically, it reassures them you can keep a secret.

To be fair, that's an important qualification for the job regardless of who is president.

It's just the political loyalty that's a bad requirement.

Why would political loyalty be bad? These are cabinet positions, not representatives of the voters whose actions change with changing voter sentiment.

The cabinet is chosen to implement the President’s policies. It would be odd to select for people opposed to the policies or those would actively try and stop them through leaks.

Political loyalty is not bad (to a degree) but it is never good when it replaces actual competence as the main qualification, or when the required degree of loyalty is unreasonable.

They are being asked if they have disparaged Patel or the administration. Not just keeping secrets. They want loyalty to the regime, not the nation. That is obvious enough given the overt actions of the entire DOJ.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com