Hacker News Reader

Comment by tgma | Hacker News Reader

The GP felt it is okay to disparage Arab News solely because they are funded by the Saudis, which evidently they don't like. By the same standards, the BBC is literally funded by another state, the UK. Both are state funded media, thus propaganda almost by definition. Remember, propaganda does not have to be false or unreliable. (Although, ironically, BBC right now is in trouble for deceptive portrayal of Trump.)

Hacker News guidelines[1] recommend posting the original source, not BBC over Arab News.

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html "Please submit the original source. If a post reports on something found on another site, submit the latter."

View on HN

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_News

The newspaper has been described as "a mouthpiece for the Saudi regime" by Qatari-owned The New Arab,[24] and regarded as "reflecting official Saudi Arabian government position" by the Associated Press and Haaretz.[5]

This is much different than the BBC which attempts to maintain independence.

> This is much different than the BBC which attempts to maintain independence.

Independence? That's just your opinion. They are clearly better at marketing than the Saudis.

Widely held: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC_independence

The corporate governance is significantly different as well.

You don’t see a difference between a major news outlet from a democratic country which has freedom of speech and an outlet from a religious monarchy which has no notion of free speech or even human rights?

UK does not have Freedom of Speech.

It does if your reference point is Saudi Arabia.

The UK is number one for wrong-speech arrests.

Saudi Arabia is one of the world leaders by number of death sentences. They have no qualms with putting you to death or giving you life imprisonment for all sorts of things, including "wrong-speech" in the form of leaving the state religion, or opposing the government. The UK isn't some shining beacon of freedom by Western standards, but it's not even in the same universe as Saudi Arabia.

At least Saudi Arabia has a positive trajectory. SA parents can genuinely see improvements in their kids lifetime.

Compared to whatever tf the UK thinks it’s doing.

Why should UK citizens want their government to invest in infrastructure and defence capabilities if they’re just handing same to radical Islamists.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=B9tzoGFszog

> But I must make one thing absolutely clear: there can be no question of the BBC ever giving in to government pressure.

Meaningless.

The UK is run by tyrannical bureaucrats, not the Government.

That's usually not the bar though, many who refuse saudi media due to saudi ownership would be completely okay with al jazeera regardless of qatari ownership, even though both countries have very dubious intentions and government system

Reply on news.ycombinator.com