> Controversy has erupted after 21% of manuscript reviews for an international AI conference were found to be generated by artificial intelligence.
21%...? Am I reading it right? I bet no one expected it's so low when they clicked this title.
21%...? Am I reading it right? I bet no one expected it's so low when they clicked this title.
In accident investigation we often refer to "holes in the swiss cheese lining up." Dereliction of duty is commonly one of the holes that lines up with all the others, and is apparently rampant in this field.
he didn't say he read it carefully after running it through the slop machine.
I think there is a far more interesting discussion to be had here about how useful the 21% percent were. How well does an AI execute a peer review?