> AI cars are already much safer drivers than humans.

I feel this statement should come with a hefty caveat.

"But look at this statistic" you might retort, but I feel the statistics people pose are weighted heavily in the autonomous service's favor.

The frontrunner in autonomous taxis only runs in very specific cities for very specific reasons.

I avoid using them out of a feeble attempt to 'do my part', but I was recently talking to a friend and was surprised that they avoid using these autonomous services because they drive, what would be to a human driver, very strange routes.

I wondered if these unconventional, often longer, routes were also taken in order to stick to well trodden and predictable paths.

"X deaths/injuries per mile" is a useless metric when the autonomous vehicles only drive in specific places and conditions.

To get the true statistic you'd have to filter the human driver statistics to match the autonomous services' data. Things like weather, cities, number of and location of people in the vehicle, and even which streets.

These service providers could do this, they have the data, compute, and engineering to do so, though they are disincentivized to do so as long as everyone keeps parroting their marketing speak for them.