Someone's accomplishments don't make them incapable of having bad opinions and being wrong. Cults of personality are harmful to progress. Opinions should hold the same weight and be held to the same scrutiny regardless of who voiced them.
Of course he can be wrong; he's human. That wasn't my point.
The thrust of the issue is that: when used suitably, AI tools can increase the rate of learning such that it changes the economics of investments in juniour developers - in a good way, to the contrary of how these tools have been discussed in the mainstream. That is an interesting take, and worthy of discussion.
Your appeal to authority here is out of place here and clearly uninformed, thus the downvotes.
What I did not know and what the Wikipedia page revealed is that he worked for a YCombinator company. Thus the downvotes.
What does any of that have to do with having a valid opinion?