This really captures something that feels unavoidable. As more AI systems act on behalf of companies, human time and attention are going to become extremely scarce. What stands out here is the idea that each person needs a personal AI that understands their values and can advocate and negotiate for them in that environment. Not to replace human judgment, but to protect it. The piece explains this future clearly and thoughtfully, and it’s hard not to feel like this is a direction we’re actually headed in.
Interesting take, but I’m unsure the “personal AI negotiator” is protective rather than escalatory. If companies deploy agents to compete for our attention, won’t personal agents just create an arms race of persuasion and counter-persuasion?
I get the concern, but I think the arms race already exists. Corporate systems are optimizing for engagement whether we participate or not. A personal AI isn’t another persuasion engine, it’s a filter and advocate that lets humans opt out of that race by default. The escalation comes from asymmetry; giving individuals their own representation is what actually restores balance rather than intensifying it.
fascinating to see a world where a mirrorverse of ourselves exists and interacts.