these sorts of comments always make me laugh considering where they are posted.
in before: "HN isn't social media!"
in before: "HN isn't social media!"
It's just that HN is a social media that respects your time and doesn't try to get you addicted. For example, HN has a very useful 'noprocrast' feature and one of the co-founders, pg, has openly worried about HN's addictiveness in the past [0].
So while HN is social media, I feel like it's qualitatively different than other platforms.
It just seems like hn is very open about acknowledging that. They'll still very much be subject to the state law
Would you personally be in favor of HN being regulated though? I'm not sure if I would.
So yes, I think HN should still have to acknowledge that the website is addictive in accordance with this state law.
This is a social media news feed-style website. Like Reddit, or old Digg.
Every forum I can remember shows the most popular threads first. Even 4chan does that with thread bumping, the most engaged-with threads sort to the top. Given the hyperbole of the times, that counts as "finely tuning their addictive homepage feed."
Hacker News, like Reddit, is both a forum and a link aggregator. It has features which are designed to influence you and to be addictive. And I promise you that people are as addicted to HN as others are to Facebook, Twitter, TikTok etc.
When I think of "forum" I think of pre-Web 2.0/social media like PHP BB. I don't think they would be categorized the same way.
They certainly could be categorized the same way. I don't think they will only because the political will isn't there and such forums aren't popular enough to matter. But if regulation of social media causes those forums to resurge in popularity then that might change.