> It starts with child abuse material, because who’s going to defend not catching that?
After the recent X CSAM generation arguments and the potential for X to get blocked in the UK, it seems like more people than I expected will defend it.
After the recent X CSAM generation arguments and the potential for X to get blocked in the UK, it seems like more people than I expected will defend it.
Should it be legal to (1) create and (2) distribute an AI generated sexual image of a (1) 18 year old, (2) 12 year old? (In both cases without their consent.)
What about a real photograph?
Why equivocate? Go ahead and own it, tell us what you think about AI-generated CSAM using plain language.
gp had helpfully numbered questions that you could have said yes/no to.
>> I will defend absolute freedom of all speech by Musk [...] By Adobe [...] [B]y Microsoft
Your support of the "absolute freedom" of "all speech" is very clear. If you somehow didn't mean the words you chose, then the lack of clarity is on you, and needs no pretense on my part.
I don't think anyone is defending it. It's all astroturf.
X installs went UP the in UK when the gov said "X allows you to generate child porn, lets block it". Thousands of brits go "free child porn on X better check it out"