The OP and resulting discussion is about whether people calling themselves (or having titles saying) 'data scientists' actually are 'scientists' or know anything about 'data'.
so one guy having a 'data scientist' title and spending his time plugging data into black boxes says very little about what 'the least part of the job' in general is.
If anything your "some social skills and some database skills" is an even poorer description. By that measure, the business analyst next door who can write some SQL scripts is a 'data scientist'. But then otoh, maybe he is, who knows? ;)
Edit: I just noticed you are the "Are there practical applications for proving theorems? It seems like it's the full employment act for pencil pushers." guy.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4634969
My apologies for replying to your comments. Won't happen again. (beware @jacquesm !)