Lunduke spreads misinformation. That's anti Open Source, anti community.
He doesn't. He just reports events as a journalist. He doesn't fight against open source.
Lunduke made factually wrong claims for hype. His mob are keen to attack Open Source developers.
Namespaces. It's been done already. Look into XLibre.
>Lunduke made factually wrong claims for hype.
Citation needed.
>His mob are keen to attack Open Source developers.
Doesn't own a mob, and never happened. Horrible accusation, by the way.
> Doesn't own a mob, and never happened. Horrible accusation, by the way.
Mob unable to response on technical question. To use logic.
> Citation needed.
His YouTube comment section speaks volumes. He manipulates technically uneducated.
Ah, the classic moving of goalposts.
I'll bite: It is far from impossible, and already solved elsewhere: Most applications do not need such functionality.
For those that do, provide mechanisms to request and facilitate access to such functionality when needed. Like portals do for other functionality. And a wrapper to request automatically for e.g. old binaries without source.
> (further slander on Lunduke and community)
Uncool.
You've just confirmed obvious. No way to improve security without breaking changes. And you demand mostly nontechnical users to blacklist applications. That's a recipe for disaster.