Name how it's possible to improve security on X11 without breakig changes.
Lunduke made factually wrong claims for hype. His mob are keen to attack Open Source developers.
Lunduke made factually wrong claims for hype. His mob are keen to attack Open Source developers.
You've just confirmed obvious. No way to improve security without breaking changes. And you demand mostly nontechnical users to blacklist applications. That's a recipe for disaster.
Namespaces. It's been done already. Look into XLibre.
>Lunduke made factually wrong claims for hype.
Citation needed.
>His mob are keen to attack Open Source developers.
Doesn't own a mob, and never happened. Horrible accusation, by the way.
> Doesn't own a mob, and never happened. Horrible accusation, by the way.
Mob unable to response on technical question. To use logic.
> Citation needed.
His YouTube comment section speaks volumes. He manipulates technically uneducated.
Ah, the classic moving of goalposts.
I'll bite: It is far from impossible, and already solved elsewhere: Most applications do not need such functionality.
For those that do, provide mechanisms to request and facilitate access to such functionality when needed. Like portals do for other functionality. And a wrapper to request automatically for e.g. old binaries without source.
> (further slander on Lunduke and community)
Uncool.