Comment by joezydeco | Hacker News Reader

Comment by joezydeco | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

And I'll assert that it just doesn't matter for this discussion.

Look, as someone said elsewhere, this is an impossible problem. You have too many factors to figure out. Have a family? Want to own a house instead of rent? Do you need a car? What lifestyle do you maintain?

The point here is that we're trying to assess what it would cost to maintain a similar standard of living in two different cities. Food. Transportation costs. Housing. Rents. Healthcare. Forget 52" TVs and trips to Paris for the time being.

  >> what it would cost to maintain a similar standard of living in two different cities.

What is would cost to maintain a similar standard of living, when spending all of your money where you live. (like most families with kids :) )

Someone who saves $20k/year or spends large amounts on travel would have a much higher standard of living in SF than Minneapolis.

Try the algebra from the other end.

"I have a wife and two kids. I want to own a 3 bedroom house with a yard. I need a car, and I drive 15,000 miles a year. We eat <x> number of meals at home each week, and <y> at restaurants. We do <z> things as a family including movies. This takes up 80% of our net income."

Okay, now what would that cost in Minneapolis, and what would that cost in San Francisco? That's all we're trying to ask.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com