> This is very shallow for a supposed deep dive.

I think it's time for a new law of headlines: anything labeled a "deep dive" isn't.

Taking feature lists and plans at face value is offensively shallow; the typical Rust fan arrogance pattern can be an explanation (if the Rust rewrite is "better", it doesn't have to be compatible with the rest of the world who uses the actual C SQLite).

Perhaps these are for deep divers who discuss Apple watch deep diving features than actual deep diving.

Yeah, I was expecting performance benchmarks, detailed feature comparisons, analysis of binary/extension compatibility, etc.