It's not discussed in the article, but wouldn't a clear reason on Samsung's part for breaking this agreement be to build its own devices using retina-quality displays? Unless, of course, there are agreements between Apple and Samsung preventing this.
iPhone 4S = 330ppi
Samsung S3 = 306ppi
I think this is just Samsung trying to save face, it's like watching two kids in a school yard, embarrassing really.
Samsung makes tablets and laptops too, but as far as I know they don't have displays that compare to Apple products.
Um, what? Samsung make some of Apple's screens like the iPad's retina display.
Right but the point is that Samsung makes them, but doesn't put them in their own devices. Imagine Samsung being able to put a retina-quality display in the galaxy tab, or in a samsung laptop. Samsung already manufactures the screens, the only question is whether or not the rights to the technology belong to Samsung, or Apple.
Aaaaand of course now Samsung is refuting the termination claims. Once again; good times abound.