I use Claude Code with both Django and React which its surprisingly good with. I rather use software thats tried and tested. The only time I let it write its own is when I want ultra minimal CSS.
In fact, LLMs will be better than humans in learning new frameworks. It could end up being the opposite that frameworks and libraries become more important with LLMs.
I don't see a base for that assumption. They're good at things like Django because there is a metric fuckton of existing open-source code out there that they can be trained on. They're already not great at less popular or even fringe frameworks and programming languages. What makes you think they'll be good at a new thing that there are almost no open resources for yet?
LLMs don't learn? The neural networks are trained just once before release and it's a -ing expensive process.
Have you tried using one on your existing code base, which is basically a framework for whatever business problem you're solving? Did it figure it out automagically?
They know react.js and nest.js and next.js and whatever.js because they had humans correct them and billions of lines of public code to train on.
I'm not talking about "do me this solo founder saas little thing". I'm talking about working on existing codebases running specialized stuff for a functional company or companies.