I don't get your point. What proportion of residents does an event need to negatively impact for you to believe that it's hassling people?
Surely it can't be 100%, right? No event in any major city, even horrific events, actually affect everyone.
Surely it can't be 100%, right? No event in any major city, even horrific events, actually affect everyone.
You can make it appear as if you have a better grasp on reality by just acknowledging that this is a much different enforcement mechanism than we've seen in the past, but you think that's okay.
Anyway there are now several known cases of people being detained or deported without deportation orders. This is another point that you could at least give the appearance of honesty and grasp on reality by acknowledging.
So what's more probable in your mind?
( Hypothesis A ) -- Mobs trying to interfere with law enforcement has caused DHS to focus on arresting and deporting immigrants without criminal background
( Hypothesis B ) -- DHS's focus on arresting and deporting immigrants without criminal background has required significant scale-up of personnel with minimal training (validated by DHS's own data) and required tactics that a large number of Americans believe to strike an unacceptable cost-benefit balance
( Hypothesis C ) -- The two facts (enforcement approach and public response) are not causally related to each other at all
At least people in the past had the integrity to acknowledge their positions head-on. One of the lamentable things missing today