Hacker News Reader

Comment by kylecazar | Hacker News Reader

It's the valuation that is wild to me (I think the idea itself has merit). But these are the new economics. I can only say "that's wild" enough before it is in fact no longer wild.

View on HN

These aren't new economics, it's just VC funds trying to boost their holdings by saying it's worth X because they said so. Frankly the FTC should make it illegal.

That's not how it works at all. Why stop at $300M, why didn't they just say $1BN out the gate?

Of course it's how it works, how else do you justify a company that is making negative profit into some how being worth $300M? Like that's just the game, IDK why people accept it. It's not democratic and all it does it prime the population for fraud and abuse.

Yeah, that's not the game at all. Have you ever invested in startups?

I don't need to "play the game" to realize private valuations are just marketing fluff not based in reality. It's literally "the greater fool" theory in action. When the incentives are to just lie and not put out something with some actual scrutiny like a 409A, it's quite clear what game is being played.

But yes, I would totally love to invest in startups with people's pension funds. It seems like the perfect scam where the only losers are the public that allows such actions.

Almost all of the world's most valuable companies were once VC investments that I'm sure you would have dismissed as just greater fool nonsense.

But more to the point, I was talking about how you apparently think VCs just make up super high valuations of the companies they invest in to justify those investments? Are you not aware that VC is a competitive market?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com