Hacker News Reader

I'll just outright tell you, that 100% the person behind the bot instructed it to complain. I saw someone copy paste the ai's response and the github issue discussion into a fresh conversation with opus 4.6 and it said the llm is clearly in the wrong.

View on HN

Can you explain why three LLM being able to identify that the issue proves that it was prompted by a human? The major reason we do multi-agent orchestration is that self-reflection mechanisms within a single agent are much weaker than self-reflection between different agents. It seems completely plausible that an LLM could produce output that a separate process wouldn't agree with.

The only thing the LLMs did was recognize patterns. There is no intelligence there. None. Zero. Zilch.

I'm struggling to see any kind of logic here.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com