Hacker News Reader

And then social media feeds will ban you using their AI. Also my family and I's AI will filter your posts so we don't see them.

>I guess you're making an "if everyone had guns" argument?

Sure why not.

View on HN

It's a mistake to assume that all or most technologies actually reach stable equilibrium when they're pitted against each other.

It's far better than everyone has nukes than just a few people who are highly interested in ruining your mind and/or finances. Governments, crime syndicates can pay for HHH-less AI.

There you are sneaking in a technology that does equilibriate (nuclear weapons) to simply assert that this is a technology that does the same.

> It's far better than everyone has anthrax than just a few people who are highly interested in...

Doesn't point to the same conclusion, does it?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com