Really? It seems about in line with what any corporation would write if ordered to give such a statement.
It ackowledges the judgement in the UK but also mentions conflicting judgements elsewhere in the world. Seems pretty balanced to me.
It ackowledges the judgement in the UK but also mentions conflicting judgements elsewhere in the world. Seems pretty balanced to me.
Apologies imply feelings, and corporations do not have feelings.
[BTW - the linked text kind of implies that they do have feelings; the article comes off as surly, resentful and not a little childish...]
[EDIT: Seems like they were never actually ordered to apologise, only to clarify that Samsung did not, in the judgment of the court, infringe on anything.]