It's astonishing to me that real software developers have considered it a good idea to generate code... and not even look at the code.
I would have thought sanity checking the output to be the most elementary next step.
I would have thought sanity checking the output to be the most elementary next step.
A lot of the time the issue isn't actually the code itself but larger architectural patterns. But realizing this takes a lot of mental work. Checking out and just accepting what exists, is a lot easier but misses subtleties that are important.
So vibers may be assuming the AI is as reliable, or at least can be with enough specs and attempts.
"Fixing defects down the road during testing costs 15x as much as fixing them during design, according to research from the IBM System Science Institute."