He is very accomplished, but one wonders if there isn't a way to accomplish the same things without bending the rules so hard.
He is very accomplished, but one wonders if there isn't a way to accomplish the same things without bending the rules so hard.
We can argue all day if that's unethical or just "hacking the rules" - ultimately, it's a choice we all need to make on our own.
Or Victor Kozeny.
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1996/...
After emigrating to the U.S. as a teenager, he was virtually penniless when he returned to Prague in 1990 at the age of 27. Yet in just four years, armed with only an economics degree from Harvard and a short stint working at the London fund manager Robert Fleming, Kozeny transformed himself into one of his country's most celebrated fund managers, with a personal fortune estimated at $200 million.
The net effect is the same but the motive is more noble. You could call it "home court advantage."
It's hard to be too upset by this. If I see a friend's startup on HN, I'm much more likely to upvote.
"The Queen of England spoke to me!"
"Oh really?! What did she say?"
"Get out of my way you bum"
I have to give him some respect for getting into YC, but based on everything I've seen, I'm not sure exactly what he 'gets done'. Mostly it seems like bragging and social hacking all the way down.