All the typical “proves” of a genocide based on arguments that make any other war genocide as well, which in turn completely devalues actual genocides that did happen, and desensitizes the public so that when an actual genocide will happen no one will react.
(1) war
(2) ceasefire that doesn’t hold
For example, there was a ceasefire between Thailand and Cambodia, and then it was violated.
Anyway there's no point arguing with people like you. The evidence is clear. The political rhetoric from Israel is clear. People who actually study genocide are very clear. Israel will "cleanse" Gaza of the "animals" and the West bank and idiots in America will lap up the propaganda and argue about whether its actually a genocide or not.
Why? There are plenty of other wars where previous ceasefires were violated. Hamas themselves refuse to put down their arms, which is also a violation of ceasefire.
> The evidence is clear.
The evidence is not clear.
> The political rhetoric from Israel is clear.
Rhetoric of some people in the government doesn’t mean much. Like any democratic country, you can have elected people who have extreme views.
> People who actually study genocide are very clear.
What are you talking about? The organization of international scholar of genocide where anyone can pay a small fee and be a scholar in the organization? Yeah, this is evidence!!!
> Israel will "cleanse" Gaza of the "animals" and the West bank and idiots in America will lap up the propaganda and argue about whether its actually a genocide or not.
So, it didn’t happen yet, but you already know it will happen?