You ignore the reality of vibe coding. If someone just prompts and never reads the code and tests the result barely, then the prompts can be a valuable insight.
But I am not rooting for either, just saying.
But I am not rooting for either, just saying.
We could also distribute the task to B, C, D, ... N actors, and assume that each of them would "cover" (i.e. understand) some part of A's output. But this suddenly becomes very labor intensive for other reasons, such as coordination and trust that all the reviewers cover adequately within the given time...
Or we could tell A that this is not a vibe playground and fire them.