Analyzing the Windows 8 Metro/Desktop interface train wreck
extremetech.com
extremetech.com
It's stories like this that prevent the rest of us from wasting money on such a POS.
Articles like this are just spread FUD in a desperate grab for pageviews.
Windows power users will likely have no need to ever touch a metro app. The only people that will be using Metro apps are tablet users, and the type of users that would add gadgets to their vista toolbar thing. (your average 40 something office drone).. and for them the metro interface is great, IMHO. It's graphically rich, and simplistic keeping the confusion levels of these typical users to a minimum.
For the rest of us, we just work on windows the same way we always have, except for now we have multiple task bars, and the os is faster, can mount cd images without software, and a few other minor features that make it a pleasure to use.
All this metro fanfare is manufactured hype.
As others have said, this is a new desktop paradigm, some bugs are to be expected. The problem is, if it's broken on non-touch-enabled machines at launch, as it seems to be, then a 'Windows 8 sucks' meme will spread, as it did with Vista, and it will be very difficult for Microsoft to come back from that before Windows 9 - by which time IOS and Android will be further entrenched, and MS will have an even bigger hill to climb.
This seems like a general problem with trying to share non-web content inside apps, regardless of the platform. If you're just putting an app wrapper around web content, like the Wikipedia app, you can provide a URL. But if your app does more than that you can't give them a web URL if there is no web implementation.