Not if they have the brain disease which makes this kind of thing appealing:
https://caviar.global/catalog/custom-iphone/iphone-17/?sort=...
Yes that flagship model incorporates an actual Rolex Daytona in solid gold.
Not if they have the brain disease which makes this kind of thing appealing:
https://caviar.global/catalog/custom-iphone/iphone-17/?sort=...
Yes that flagship model incorporates an actual Rolex Daytona in solid gold.
I wouldn't go as far to call it "brain disease" though: in a sense, it is OK for someone well off to spend on expensive products (made by less rich), so things would equalize at least a bit.
Just like we in IT might happily pay 3% of our salary on slightly better shoes, and someone else would claim we have a "brain disease" because you can get perfectly good shoes for 5x less money.
Furthermore, who in IT is paying 3% on shoes? Even if you’re the hypebeast buying $1200 Balenciagas, I don’t see how the math works out.
3% of your monthly salary for $200-$500 shoes (I see plenty amateur runners getting carbon sole shoes in this price range, for instance), when you could get a pair for less than $50.
I would say most of Europe talks and thinks in monthly (and even net after-tax salary), so hopefully that helps in the future when someone does not adapt to US gross annual salary figures for you.
> https://caviar.global/catalog/custom-iphone/iphone-17/london...
Or maybe Big Ben hides the charging coils too.