You/we are all susceptible to this sort of thing, and I call BS on anyone who says they check every little thing their agent does with the same level of scrutiny as they would if they were doing it manually.
They don't even deserve a lot of credit because of how obvious consequences like these would be.
Why? I do that. I give it broad permissions but I also give it very specific instructions, especially when it's about deleting resources. I work in small chunks and review before committing, and I push before starting another iteration (so that if something goes wrong, I have a good state I can easily restore).
I'm the one with the brain. The LLM can regurgitate a ton of plumbing and save days of sifting through libraries, but it'll still get something wrong because at the core it's still a probabilistic output generator. No matter how good it becomes, it still cannot judge whether it's doing something a human will immediately spot as "stupid".
Interacting with and fixing API calls automatically is something that normally works for me, but allowing the agent to run a terraform destroy is something I'd have never let it execute, I'd have been very specific about that.
This is example of someone who has let AI do too much of their "thinking" for them and it's led to brain rot.
In any case, I think spending few seconds typing into your terminal and get yourself in human review mode is mindset improvement if it's not 100% speed optimal.