Agree to disagree. It allows badly written stuff to be defended, I would argue more often than alternative more acceptable case scenarios.
Others are free to dislike this.
Yes, that doesn't mean standards don't exist, nor that good and bad writing styles don't exist.
Don't be one of those 'everything is subjective' doofuses, please.
At the end of the day, it really is subjective: A reader either likes a style and/or finds that it is conducent to conveying meaning, or they do not.
(Speaking of unlikable styles, I'm just going to take the liberty to interpret the name-calling as your resignation on this matter. Have a nice day, comrade.)
This monumentally misses the point.
> it really is subjective
And this is just the disappointing and flatly incorrect view I hoped not to see. Sigh. Have a great day/night buddy.