The court filing provides more information than just giving ammo to harassers so I do not see them as directly equivalent. I also do not agree with the premise that if one person does something bad it would justify someone else in doing so.
Plus - you’re telling me that highlighting an individual and posting their home address on an official government account is not “giving ammo to harassers”?
Not "just".
What other purpose did that unredacted post serve?
How does it feel to experience cognitive dissonance this hard?