Pretty much, the article assumes people didn't build the wrong thing before AI. Except that did happen all the time and it just happened slower, took longer to realize that it was the wrong thing and then building the right thing took longer.

It's funny, because you could actually take that story and use it to market AI.

> I once watched a team spend six weeks building a feature based on a Slack message from a sales rep who paraphrased what a prospect maybe said on a call. Six weeks.

Except now with AI it takes one engineer 6 hours, people realize it's the wrong thing and move on. If anything, I would say it helps prove the point that typing faster _does_ help.