> We definitely aren't trying to convince anyone to use our free, open source library that doesn't need it.
Could've fooled me...
Could've fooled me...
I guess your threshold for calling someone an asshole is a bit low.
I don't have a problem with using video.js for the reasons the parent poster mentioned, but HTML5 video is insanely easy to implement, and there's no reason to take on a dependency like this if you don't need something beyond what the web platform already gives you.