Hacker News Reader

I’m surprised they went with outlook rather than something like thunderbird. And I’m surprised they are burning power on an os that can run outlook.

NASA is a large government organization. Microsoft Outlook is understandable. I assumed they were reading their normal email.

Laptop uses negligible power. The solar panels generate eight houses worth of power (they don't give number).

A Macbook Neo can run outlook just fine and pulls what, 20 watts?

I would be fascinated to see the actual measured power consumption at baseline and when it's actually running Outlook