Right but they're not being sued by their shareholders, they're being sued by a handful of customers and "on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated".
To be fair, they’re being sued by customers who were marketed memberships.
Is that the case history? Or bullshit assumption? Because this looks plaintiff sponsored.
I mean, one of the legal firms behind this is Milberg PLLC, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milberg, who has been charged with illegally paying plaintiffs to sue in order to enrich themselves.