The soul might just be a check engine light that got too good at its job

There is AI signature in the essay and that’s because AI was used to edit and iterate. Does that make the thought any less real? AI wasn’t asked to generate something out of random. It was a conversation on how I feel personally and used AI to edit for my lack of language competency.

Personally I believe we miss out on a lot but just filtering out things that may have an AI signature in it.

Cheers!

Even though HN now restricts Show HN to not include AI submissions, the new section is chock full of them. There’s no winning here.

Yeah, the notion of "consciousness" as byproduct of simulation engine is more evocative than most theories I've heard. It's sort of like evolving a sensory organ for "five dimensional" space, if we want to be cute and classify "probability" as an experiential (vs mathematical) dimension.

It also explains why we have a persistent narrative of self: as a baseline to navigate an increasingly complex simulation space. Make a complex enough simulation, and the feedback from the simulation complex can rival the input from the sensorium.

Without that baseline, a "return to zero", the organism might have a hard time dialing back into its sensorium, barring cultural and technological improvements, before the actual real world bites off your entire body.

Which segues into the various ways this can go wrong: delusions, poisonous ideology, etc etc etc all the way to psychotic break, hallucinations - where the simulation space overwhelms the sensorium.

It's been pondered by others far smarter than I, but I often wonder if "AGI" - as the technophiles imagine it - is even possible without the mind being in a body.

AI slop