> Why should journalism engage in the implied pro-active censorship here?
Because in this particular case it endangers subject's life.
Because in this particular case it endangers subject's life.
This seems like a stretch. Mr Back is already a well-known wealthy person who (presumably) owns lots of crypto. I think it's a stretch to think this article significantly increase the danger to his life.
You're assuming and extrapolating.
"this particular case" ≠ "never"
I don't have anything to add that isn't already argued in other comments in this thread. I'm just pointing out that your opinions are not logical derivations.