> “Fiverr does not proactively expose users’ private information. The content in question was shared by users in the normal course of marketplace activity to showcase work samples, under agreements and approvals between buyers and sellers. This type of content requires the buyer’s explicit consent before it can be uploaded. As always, any request to remove content is handled promptly by our team."
https://sqmagazine.co.uk/fiverr-security-flaw-private-docume...
It sounds like they are trying to claim the users involved published the links and that's why they are on Google? But how could anyone believe that multiple users intentionally published their SSN?
Re the takedown, I'm also guessing it's from Cloudinary. Maybe HTTP Referrer based?
ChatGPT recently had a similar case with the sharing feature on conversations leading to publicly indexed convos. That incident would have also matched the implied definition of sharing here.
Each result from the query site:fiverr-res.cloudinary.com form 1040 returns 404
Utterly inexcusable that this is still up after so many hours.